I. The legal recognition of the Human destined to become.

Consensus omnium (Proved by universal consent):

‍"Do you want to protect this girl's presence tomorrow? If so, who do you truly want to protect?"‍

Accessing the legal recognition of the Human to come rests on only two questions, to which the answers are self-evident.

The first question appeals to each one’s sensitivity (A), the second is nothing but a simple logical deduction (B):

A. The recognition of the Human Right to be here tomorrow (and live his/her moment of life to come).

I Want her to be here tomorrow
> I recognise her Right to be here tomorrow

1: Presentation of the data:
- There is a girl in front of us today, and because she is alive and healthy, we can expect her to be here tomorrow, living a moment of her life.

- This is a fact.
2: Expression of Sensitivity for others / Question:
-My question then to you is: Do you want this girl to be here tomorrow, living her moment of life to come?
2: Expression of Sensitivity for others / Answer:
- And my answer is: I certainly do! This girl has to be here tomorrow and live her moment of life to come!
3: Identification of a Right:
- For this purpose, you propose to protect - to legally protect - her presence tomorrow?

- Of course !

- Someone is legally protected on the basis of a Right. In the name of what Right would you protect this little girl to ensure that she is here tomorrow, living her moment of life to come?
‍
- Quite simply: in the name of her Right to be here tomorrow and live her moment of life to come.
‍
- It is today that you want to protect her presence tomorrow, so it is today that you recognise her this Right?

- Of course! I recognise that today, this girl has the Right to be here tomorrow (and to live her moment of life to come).
-

B. The recognition of the Human destined to become tomorrow’s Right to be (and live his/her moment of life to come).

I recognise her Right to be here tomorrow > I recognise the Right of the one she is destined to become to be.

4: Identification of the beneficiary of this Right:
- I have a second question for you.

- Please.

- Who, more specifically, is the beneficiary of this Right? Is this Right to be here tomorrow recognised for the one this girl is today or for the one she is destined to become tomorrow?

- Again, the answer is self-evident: This Right to be here tomorrow is granted to the one this little girl is destined to become tomorrow.

‍- You have just admitted the legal recognition of the Human to come.

- I cannot dispute this deduction!
-

Conclusion :

- Currently, only the Human who exists is legally recognised. Do you therefore acknowledge that this legal provision is flawed?

- Certainly! Having nothing to challenge in your intellectual reasoning, which is based on two self-evident questions, I cannot deny that the law has always been misguided, having had too narrow a conception of the Human it ought to protect.

‍- So, what is the correct understanding of Human who should be protected?

- The law should not protect only the Human we are today and who currently exists, but also the one we are destined to become and who does not yet exist.
"No one can deny wanting others to be here tomorrow; thus, no one can deny that a human is still denied legal recognition today!"

Assessment:

"I Want today to protect your presence in the future.

But, when I speak of your presence in the future, I am not referring to the You of the present moment.

‍ The You I want to protect today is the You that extends into the future."

Once a legal data is identified, the question of its application arises:

> The new hl and the embryo
Follow us
YouTubeInstagramTwitter
© 2022 Copyright. Homme Droit